Legal Opinion

State v. Fugitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, the Stone Circuit Court. — Hon. J. C. Lamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

The defendant was prosecuted under the following information:

“ State of Missouri, y. “ Eichard Fugitt and George Garroutte.

In the Stone County Circuit Court, October Term, 1895.

*‘Comes now Albert Hodges, prosecuting attorney within and for Stone county, in the state of Missouri, and under his oath of office informs the court that on June 29, 1895, in the county of Stone, state of Missouri, Eichard Fugitt and George Garroutte did unlawfully, willfully, maliciously and contemptuously, disturb and disquiet a congregation of people, then and there met for religious worship, by then and there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KindrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. State v. ThayerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API