Legal Opinion

Mishewal Wappo Tribe v. Jewell

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 23, 2015No. Case No. 5:09-cv-02502-EJDPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 185, 186

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge

In the earlier part of the twentieth century, the United States government passed a series of laws affecting its relationship with the indigenous inhabitants of California and their descendants. One of those laws, the Indian Appropriations Act of 1906, permitted the Secretary of the Interior (the “Secretary”) to purchase parcels of land, or “rancherías,” throughout the state for use by California Indians.1 Fifty *932years later, Congress…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WildEarth Guardians v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  2. Butte County v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  3. Gwitchyaa Zhee Corporation v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
  4. Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API