Hedlund v. Ford Marketing Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s amended complaint against Ford Motor Company and Ford Marketing Corporation. The issue is whether the amendment related back to the date of the original complaint, thus precluding the application of the two-year statute of limitations. We find that it did and that the trial court erred in its dismissal.
This is a products liability case. The original complaint was filed on April 16, 1979, and named as defendants, inter alia, “Ford Marketing Corporation” and “Ford Motor Company”. The complaint alleged that an injury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edwards v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Ratcliffe v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Washington v. T. G. & Y. Stores Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Wentz v. Alberto Culver CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1969
- Holden v. R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Camasura v. CamasuraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Hedlund v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- State ex rel. Corbin v. TollesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990