Legal Opinion

People v. Ridley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him lacks merit. The defendant matched the description relayed over the police radio and was observed near the scene of the crime within 5 to 10 minutes after the occurrence. These facts, considered together with the defendant’s suspicious behavior in standing behind a bush counting money, provided the necessary predicate for a finding of probable cause to effectuate the defendant’s arrest (see, People v Lypka, 36 NY2d 210; People v Saylor, 113 AD2d 904; People v Messam, 112 AD2d 449).

Moreover, we reject the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. LypkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ZarzuelaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. People v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. LeSeurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API