Legal Opinion
(PS) Cleveland v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 18, 2019No. 2:16-cv-02308Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINGO L. CLEVELAND, SR., No. 2:16-cv-02308 MCE AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly 18 referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). This matter is before the court on a motion 19 for summary judgment brought by defendant Janssen Pharmaceuticals. ECF No. 93. Plaintiff has 20 opposed the motion (ECF No. 107) and defendant has filed a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.