Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McClellan v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1997No. 92-CF-1522Published

1ConcurrenceFarrell, Associate Judge

I join Judge Belson’s opinion for the court. The confrontation issue is a close one. .In the case of a key government witness like Smith, claimed to have proven his bias against McClellan by shooting at him a week before the -alleged murder, barring cross-examination of Smith about that act raises serious Sixth Amendment concerns. Even if the jurors no more than eyeballed Smith and listened to his voice as he admitted, denied, or equivocated about the shooting, this might have contributed to their sense that he was an unreliable accuser of McClellan.1 Nevertheless, as Judge Belson…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. People v. WilkersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API