Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ware v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Danville

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1933No. 3779Published

1DissentHudspeth, Justice

A further statement of facts seems desirable. Two years before the death of J. P. Ware, a resident of Kentucky, the father of appellee, the appellee entered a 600-aere farm of decedent, rent free, except for the payment of taxes, under written contracts of lease containing provisions for compensating of appellee for any improvements which he might put upon the land. These contracts are set out in the amended answers of the minor defendants and the Farmers’ National Bank of Danville (denominated in appellee’s petition, herein as “primary executor’’), where it is denied that appellee made any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Staples' Ex'ors v. StaplesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API