In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-10
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partQuince, J.
I agree with Chief Justice Canady that we should not authorize for publication or use new standard instruction 403.10 (Negligence Failure to Warn). However, I also conclude that standard instruction 403.18 as modified should be authorized for publication and use.
APPENDIX
PL
PRODUCT LIABILITY
Issues
PL4 — Express-warranty
PL 2 — Implied warranty of merchanta-
bility
PL 3 — Implied warranty of fitness for
particular purpose
PL 4 — Strict—liability - (manufacturing
defect)
PL-5 — Strict liability (design-defect) Burden of-pr-oof (greater — weight of the
Defense issues
403 PRODUCTS LIABILITY
403.1 Introduction
4…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.