Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ragsdale

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 9, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before Gage, J., Fairfield, Action by Mary A. Martin et al. against Glenn W. Ragsdale et al. From Circuit decree, defendants appeal. cites: Swygert was bona ñde purchaser: 6 S. C., 159; 23 S. C., 494; 1 Story Eq., secs. 409, 308; 2 Pom. Eq., sec. 754; 23 S. C., 494; 21 S. C„ 212; 6 Rich. Eq., 176; 31 S. C., 322; 34 S. C., 147; 53 S. C., 30; 14 S. C., 322. Actual notice will supply place of registration only: 1 McC., 268; 2 McC., 153; Bail.

Read the full summary

Before Gage, J., Fairfield, Action by Mary A. Martin et al. against Glenn W. Ragsdale et al. From Circuit decree, defendants appeal. cites: Swygert was bona ñde purchaser: 6 S. C., 159; 23 S. C., 494; 1 Story Eq., secs. 409, 308; 2 Pom. Eq., sec. 754; 23 S. C., 494; 21 S. C„ 212; 6 Rich. Eq., 176; 31 S. C., 322; 34 S. C., 147; 53 S. C., 30; 14 S. C., 322. Actual notice will supply place of registration only: 1 McC., 268; 2 McC., 153; Bail. Eq., 1; 4 Rich., 34; 1 Strob., 573; 3 Strob., 266; 2'McC., 273; Speer’s Eq., 212, 244; 6 Rich., 463; 3 S. C., 515; 51 S. C., 348. Testimony of deceased…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary

3 (after stating the foregoing facts). We will first consider those exceptions assigning error on the part of the Circuit Judge, in ruling that J. S. Swyg’ert did not occupy the position of purchaser for valuable consideration without notice of the rights of the plaintiffs. Swygert testified that he believed the title to the land covered by his mortgage was valid, and there is no testimony contradicting this statement. He is, however, chargeable with constructive notice of all the facts disclosed by the record, although he did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. May v. Le ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Aultman v. UtseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  4. Phillips v. YonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mulherin-Howell v. CobbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Mitchell v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. Dyson v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Southern Railway v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API