Borst v. Borst

OPINION

By BARNES, PJ.

In the instant case it is the contention of plaintiff that the defendant perpetrated a fraud upon the court in the divorce action by not advising the court as to the terms of the separation agreement. In support of this claim of fraud the case of McEntire v McEntire et, 107 Oh St, 510, is cited and quoted from at length.

This reported case has many similar features to the instant case and requires a very careful analysis in a determination as to its effect. There are also features not in common and these are important.

In the reported case the Court of Appeals, hearing the…