Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Marriage of O'Brien

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 2009No. 2-07-0264Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE O’MALLEY,

specially concurring:

Petitioner asks us to clarify the standards governing removal of judges in light of the apparently conflicting treatment the issue has received in Illinois case law. Petitioner notes in his brief that, according to Hoellen, a party seeking substitution for cause must demonstrate the judge’s subjective bias as well as “evidence of prejudicial trial conduct” (Hoellen, 367 Ill. App. 3d at 248), and he questions how Hoellen can be reconciled with Wheatley, a decision in which, without reference to any prejudicial conduct of the original trial judge and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API