State Industrial Insurance System v. Partlow-Hursh
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The State Industrial Insurance System (SUS) appeals the district court’s decision excusing respondent’s untimely appeal of her worker’s compensation claim and concluding that the time period specified for filing an appeal in NRS 616.5422(1) 1 is procedural. We agree with appellant that the 30-day time limit prescribed in the statute is jurisdictional, and mandatory, and thus respondent’s untimely appeal must be dismissed. We therefore reverse the lower court’s decision.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The essential fact in this case is not in dispute: respondent’s notice of appeal was…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Benjamin Parker Blades v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Nyberg v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Bailey v. SWCC and Eastern Associated Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cooper Industrial Products v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Northern Nevada Ass'n of Injured Workers v. Nevada State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Holiday Inn Downtown v. BarnettNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Kame v. Employment Security DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Department of Industrial Relations v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Seino v. Employers Insurance Co. of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.