Wernecke v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceWhelan, J.
I concur that the judgment of nonsuit *889should be reversed, but for reasons other than those upon which the majority opinion rests.
The action was by the beneficiary named in an application for insurance by an applicant who met his death by accident the day following the making of the application and the issuance to him of a receipt, the language of which, almost in full, is set out in the majority opinion. I agree with the trial court that the language of the receipt is unambiguous.
However, the amended complaint here alleged the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the receipt; the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hosea Payne v. S. S. Nabob and North German Lloyd and Lavino Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Margaret L. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Constance C. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Brunt v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.