Gray v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1DissentLynch, J.
Because I believe that the seizure at issue unconstitutionally modifies a valid court order, I respectfully dissent.
The court correctly states ante at 671, that neither the executive nor legislative branch may reverse, modify, or contravene a court order. See, e.g., Department of Revenue v. Jarvenpaa, 404 Mass. 177, 183 (1989). I also agree that, at least to some extent, a judicial decree incorporates existing pertinent statutes.1 See ante at 675; Ierardi, petitioner, 366 Mass. 640, 650 (1975); Russell Box Co. v. Commissioner of Corps. & Taxation, 325 Mass. 536, 540 (1950); Sheehan,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Commissioner of Health & HospitalsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Department of Revenue v. JarvenpaaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Brach v. Chief Justice of District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.