Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gray v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1996Published

1DissentLynch, J.

Because I believe that the seizure at issue unconstitutionally modifies a valid court order, I respectfully dissent.

The court correctly states ante at 671, that neither the executive nor legislative branch may reverse, modify, or contravene a court order. See, e.g., Department of Revenue v. Jarvenpaa, 404 Mass. 177, 183 (1989). I also agree that, at least to some extent, a judicial decree incorporates existing pertinent statutes.1 See ante at 675; Ierardi, petitioner, 366 Mass. 640, 650 (1975); Russell Box Co. v. Commissioner of Corps. & Taxation, 325 Mass. 536, 540 (1950); Sheehan,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Commissioner of Health & HospitalsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Department of Revenue v. JarvenpaaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Brach v. Chief Justice of District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API