Legal Opinion

Brach v. Chief Justice of District Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1982PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

In this action, the plaintiffs challenge the validity of Administrative Regulation No. 2-79 (AR 2-79) (promulgated by the Chief Justice of the District Court Department) under which, upon conviction of certain motor vehicle offenses, they were required to surrender their drivers’ licenses to the court. We hold that the challenged regulation, although it is a sensible solution to a serious public problem, is invalid. 3

1. Background and statutory scheme. General Laws c. 90, § 24 (1) (a) and (2) (a), as amended, lists a number of motor vehicle offenses and the respective penalties for conviction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Hillis v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Wolf v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Batchelder v. Allied Stores International, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Lockhart v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Gray v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API