Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 3, 2012No. SC 92127PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

The state of Missouri appeals an order of post-conviction relief granting movant Codey L. Smith a new trial based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Smith’s counsel did not call as a witness or investigate the codefendant of the crime, who would have testified at trial that Smith was not involved in the robbery. For this omission, which reasonably could have changed the outcome of Smith’s trial, counsel was ineffective. The motion court’s judgment is affirmed.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On August 30, 2006, two men armed with .22-caliber guns and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API