Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Thrower

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 3, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior court. October 22, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtCandlek, J.

1. As lias been repeatedly held, this court will not consider grounds of a motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, oral or documentary, unless the evidence is set out in the motion, either literally or in substance, or attached thereto as an exhibit. Petty v. Brunswick R. Co., 109 Ga. 666, and cases cited; Fraser v. State, 112 Ga. 13; Freeman v. Mencken, 115 Ga. 1017.

2. It is not the office of a motion for a new trial to call in question the sufficiency of an amendment to pleadings. Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 874 (6).

3. This court will in no case reverse the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petty v. Brunswick & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Freeman & Turner News Co. v. Mencken & Bro.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Fraser v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Fountain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Gunn v. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Maxwell v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API