Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Labor Relations Board v. Preston H. Haskell Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1980No. 79-1051Published

1ConcurrenceThornberry, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result of Judge Gee’s opinion. But with deference I cannot agree with the reason given for denying enforcement of the Board’s order against Haskell. In my opinion, this case cannot be decided on the statute of limitations issue. We must decide whether Haskell committed an unfair labor practice on April 30, 1976, when it refused to execute and apply collective bargaining agreements allegedly negotiated on its behalf by the Negotiating Committee of the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC).

Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act provides in pertinent part…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. StrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Beckham, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. McAx Sign Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API