Legal Opinion
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. v. Biovail Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 22, 2006No. Civil Action 04-2235 (JR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Three related antitrust actions have been filed against Biovail Corporation in this court. All three are by purchasers of Biovail’s brand-name drug Tiazac. All three demand damages for antitrust injuries that the plaintiffs attribute to Biovail’s unlawful (but successful) attempts to keep cheaper generic versions of Tiazac off the market. The first two of these cases, Twin Cities Bakery Workers Health & Welfare Fund v. Biovail Corp., No. 01-2197, and Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp., No. 03-2075, were consolidated. On March 31, 2005, I granted summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Hicks, Eric A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Palmer v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Harbour v. Parker Hannifin Corporation Medical Systems DivisionDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Palmer v. Gmac Commercial MortgageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010