Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Chicago v. Pick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1911Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Harry M. Waggoner, Judge, presiding.

1Dissent

Cartwright, Hand and Dunn, JJ.,

dissenting:

The purpose and effect of the condemnation proceeding was not to acquire some particular interest in the property taken, but to appropriate to public use the property itself and all interests therein. (Stubbings v. Village of Evanston, 136 Ill. 37.) The fact that the tax deeds of Jacob Glos were not valid as conveyances of the legal title does not. affect his right to compensation if they had any value, since the constitution requires compensation for all rights in property, whether legal or equitable. (Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. Miller,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stubbings v. Village of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Gage v. Consumers' Electric Light Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Moore v. WaymanIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API