Legal Opinion

Whatley v. Cardinal Pest Control

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 19, 1980No. 79-198PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy G. Whatley challenges the trial court's grant of the defendant's motion for summary judgment in a suit claiming personal injuries in consequence of Cardinal Pest Control's negligent application of a pesticide chemical compound known as "Purge."

We begin our review by reaffirming the general proposition — too well settled to require citation of authority — that rarely is summary judgment appropriate in a claim based upon negligence. Stated another way, this Court is firmly committed to a rule of extreme caution in its review of a summary judgment granted in a tort claim context. But not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donald v. City National Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Campbell v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Oliver v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Jehle-Slauson Const. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects and Consulting EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Lawson State Community College v. First Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Smith v. CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON FINANCIAL CENTERSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API