Legal Opinion
Drueke v. Boylon
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1910No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Kent; Perkins, J. Bill by William Drueke, Jr., and George Egeler, administrators of the estate of Frank Koch, deceased, against Mary E. Boylon, for the appointment of a receiver to wind up the affairs of a partnership. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill to reform the schedule attached to the partnership agreement. From the decree rendered, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On the 18th day of November, 1907, Frank Koch and Mary E. Boylon entered into the following agreement in writing:
“This agreement, made the 18th day of November, 1907, between Mary E. Boylon of the city of Grand Rapids, county of Kent, State of Michigan, party of the first part, and Frank Koch, of the same place, party of the second part, for and in consideration of the sum of $3,500, witnesseth: That the said Mary E. Boylon, party of the first part, in consideration of the agreement hereinafter contained, to be performed by Frank Koch, agrees to sell and deliver to the said Frank Koch, party…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kinyon v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Killefer v. McLainMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grant v. FletcherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- People v. BingamanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984