Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Rehearing of case reported 31 Neb., 240. cited: Monell v. Terwilliger, 8 Neb., 360; Post v. Garrow, 18 Id., 682. cited: Vollmer v. Slate, 24 Neb., 838; Wharton, Homicide, 194 and note; Caw v. People, 3 Neb., 369; Stewart v. State, 1 O. St., 66; Parrish v. State, 14 Neb., 60; Bradshaw r. State, 17 Id., 147.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

An opinion was filed in this case in January, 1891, and is reported in 31 Neb., 240. A rehearing was granted upon certain instructions and the cause again submitted. We see no reason for disturbing the verdict and judgment. It is unnecessary to review the facts or the law as stated by the court below. It is evident that the penalty is none too severe for the offense committed. The judgment is

Adhered to.

The other judges concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895