Legal Opinion

Farmers' Supply Co. v. Inglewright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. Docket No. 114Published

Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Farmers’ Supply Company against William H. Inglewright. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case was brought in justice’s court. The case was appealed to the circuit court. At the conclusion of the testimony plaintiff asked for a directed verdict. This request was denied. The case was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From a judgment upon this verdict, the case is brought here by writ of error.

It is the claim of the plaintiff that its case is based upon two notes, one of which reads:

“Traverse City, Mich., Oct. 24, 1910.
“No. 14.
“November 30th after date, for value received, I promise to pay to Farmers’ Supply Company or order one hundred and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. CrandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. CorbitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. M. Rumely & Co. v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wheeler v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Williams v. Walsh Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API