Legal Opinion
Smith v. Board of Education
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1946No. Civ. 15283PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to require the Board of Education of Los Angeles City Junior College District to reinstate plaintiff in his position as a permanent classroom teacher in the Los Angeles City Junior College District, as of the date when he was dismissed, June 30, 1944, and to pay him his salary as such teacher from the 1st day of September, 1944, until he is reemployed in his former position. Judgment was for defendants and plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff was employed as a probationary teacher by the Board of Education of the Los Angeles City High School District in the year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gould v. Santa Ana High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Newbury v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- McKee v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Brightman v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brennan v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1987