Legal Opinion

Crittenden v. Adams & Crittenden

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mason, Justice.

I am satisfied, after a careful examination of this case, that the plaintiff has not met the requirements of section 327 of the Code in serving his notice of appeal. On the last day of serving his notice of appeal the plaintiff’s attorney served it by depositing two written notices of appeal in the post office at the place of residence of plaintiff’s attorney, some 16 miles from the clerk’s office and the residence of defendants’ attorneys. One of the notices was addressed to the defendants’ attorneys and the other to the county clerk, and the postage thereon paid on both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gay v. GayNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Bloodgood v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cotes v. CarrollNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Garrette v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Manchester v. Van BruntNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Cone v. HooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  5. Washington Life Insurance v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API