Legal Opinion

Homeland Insurance Co. of America v. Carolina Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether the Carolina policy was in force at the time of the loss, and this depends upon whether Dobbert had authority to cancel the policy, waiving the five days’ notice, and substitute the policies of the Homeland Insurance Company and the other two companies.

According to the testimony of Mr. Cohen, Mr. O’Connell was instructed to get $100,000 use-and-occupancy insurance and to keep the mill insured for that amount; O’Connell was free to place the insurance in whatever companies he saw fit so long as he kept the mill continually insured up to that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rose Inn Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Kerr v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Schauer v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  3. Kopperud v. ChickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API