Kopperud v. Chick
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The sole question before us is whether the plaintiff is the real party in interest in this suit against a third party or has lost that status by reason of entering into the loan agreement with his insurer. The loan receipt and agreement detailed the claim, disclaimed liability, and re cited the reasonableness of compromise settlements, the financial inability of the plaintiff, and the casualty company’s desire to make a loan for the purpose of making the settlements. The agreement provided the loan did not satisfy any obligation of the company to the plaintiff and was repayable only to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Clow v. National Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Cleveland Paint & Color Co. v. Bauer Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Yezek v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Berge v. Value Enterprises, Ltd. (In re Berge)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Schmidt v. HenkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Schmidt v. HenkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Vida Longevity Fund, L.P. v. GoldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025