Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Hearty

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1954No. 20206PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

76 So.2d 453 (1954)

Mr. and Mrs. Elmo G. CHAMPAGNE, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

Mr. and Mrs. Emmett HEARTY, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 20206.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans.

November 8, 1954.

Rehearing Denied January 3, 1955.

Porteous & Johnson, Parnell J. Hyland, New Orleans, for appellees.

Wm. M. Campbell, Jr., Harry R. Cabral, New Orleans, for appellants.

REGAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Elmo G. Champagne, lessees, instituted this suit against the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Emmett Hearty, lessors, endeavoring to recover the sums of $125 and $2,500 respectively, for medical expenses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roppolo v. PickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Labat v. Gaerthner Realty Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Gardiner v. De SallesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Gray v. Succession of SpiroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. White v. JugeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. McNally v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Matranga v. HilmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Culps v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API