Legal Opinion

Jay Boyer, Jr. v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 2015No. 14-3273UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the District Court’s grant of Jay Boyer, Jr.’s habeas petition on the ground that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue for suppression of Boyer’s confession because his interrogation violated the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and its progeny. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

I

Boyer was arrested in December of 2001 in connection with an October 2001 home-invasion robbery in Northumberland County during which three perpetrators— one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CREAMER v. JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  2. DIAZ v. OBERLANDERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. SAUNDERS v. HARRYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. YEAGER v. SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API