Cochran v. Cochran
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this divorce action, the only question contested was the legitimacy of a child of the parties. Appellant husband insists that he could not possibly be the father. The trial court found otherwise, and this appeal ensued.
With the consent of respondent wife, a vasectomy was performed upon appellant on August 10, 1966, by Dr. Frederick Hahn. Dr. Hahn was called as a witness by appellant and testified that in the operation approximately 1 inch of each of the tubes carrying the sperm was removed. The remaining ends were ligated (tied) with permanent silk sutures. Scar tissue formed at each of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Pierson v. PiersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Benedict v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. RoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hayward v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Meeker v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Barcelo v. BarceloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- L. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.