Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 27, 1970No. 115-40712-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this divorce action, the only question contested was the legitimacy of a child of the parties. Appellant husband insists that he could not possibly be the father. The trial court found otherwise, and this appeal ensued.

With the consent of respondent wife, a vasectomy was performed upon appellant on August 10, 1966, by Dr. Frederick Hahn. Dr. Hahn was called as a witness by appellant and testified that in the operation approximately 1 inch of each of the tubes carrying the sperm was removed. The remaining ends were ligated (tied) with permanent silk sutures. Scar tissue formed at each of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Malstrom v. KallandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pierson v. PiersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Benedict v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doe v. RoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hayward v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Meeker v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Barcelo v. BarceloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. L. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API