Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. O'Neill
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of statutory procedures for the arbitration of motor vehicle disputes that, for manufacturers but not for consumers, severely limit the scope of judicial review for challenges to adverse arbitration determinations. This case is here pursuant to the remand that we ordered in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assn. of the United States, Inc. v. O’Neill, 203 Conn. 63, 523 A.2d 486 (1987) (Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assn. I), to amplify a factual record that we deemed inadequate for consideration of a reservation raising a number of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Genovese v. Gallo Wine Merchants, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.