Legal Opinion
State v. Young
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1992No. 19106PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
We are called upon to determine whether the district court erred in not providing Michael E. Young with appointed counsel at a probation revocation hearing. Concluding that the failure to do so was error, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Young pleaded guilty to one count of drawing a check without sufficient funds. The court imposed a twenty-four month sentence with a nine month minimum term, but suspended the execution of the sentence and placed Young on probation. Among the conditions of probation were that Young not violate any laws, that he not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Henderson v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Pocatello-Chubbuck Auditorium or Community Center DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LindsayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.