Legal Opinion

Jimmie McCoy, III v. B. Sipes, et al.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 3, 2026No. 6:23-cv-00404Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JIMMIE McCOY, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-CV-404-RAW-DES B. SIPES, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jimmie McCoy, III (“McCoy”), appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, brings this federal civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. 11. Before the court are Defendants Sipes, Musile, Miller and Lysinger’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 24) and Defendant Holland’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 26). McCoy did not file a response. After careful review, the Court finds that Defendants Sipes, Musile,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API