Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.

At the October 1948 Term of the Superior Court in the County of Waldo, the respondent was found guilty of breaking and entering a house and committing larceny therein. The case is presented to us with written arguments. The printed record contains a bill of exceptions which has not been allowed. As the court said in Manheim v. Carr, 82 Me. 473, 475 (1873), “but the exceptions do not appear to have been allowed and cannot, therefore, be considered.”

It is an elementary rule that exceptions must be allowed or their truth otherwise established before the exceptions will be heard in this court.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradford v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  2. McKown v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  3. Poland v. McDowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. State v. ShortwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Moores v. Inhabitants of SpringfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  2. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  3. State v. HansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. State v. RaineySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  5. State v. MorinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API