Legal Opinion

State v. Arculeo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1997No. 72,939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.: The defendant, Scott M. Arculeo, appeals from the trial court’s prison sentence, claiming that the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act requires the imposition of a nonprison sanction. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision that a prison sentence was the appropriate disposition because the defendant had committed his present crime while on conditional release under the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4603d(a). State v. Arculeo, 22 Kan. App. 2d 91, 911 P.2d 818 (1996). We granted the defendant’s petition for review.

The facts in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. ArculeoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. SpainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. State v. BolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. PailletSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  5. High Plains Oil, Ltd. v. High Plains Drilling Program-1981, Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API