State v. Arculeo
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.: The defendant, Scott M. Arculeo, appeals from the trial court’s prison sentence, claiming that the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act requires the imposition of a nonprison sanction. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision that a prison sentence was the appropriate disposition because the defendant had committed his present crime while on conditional release under the provisions of K.S.A. 21-4603d(a). State v. Arculeo, 22 Kan. App. 2d 91, 911 P.2d 818 (1996). We granted the defendant’s petition for review.
The facts in this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. ArculeoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. BolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. PailletSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- High Plains Oil, Ltd. v. High Plains Drilling Program-1981, Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.