Legal Opinion

Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Complaint as follows :

“ Harry Taylor complains of the Pullman Palace Car Company, a corporation engaged in the business of carrying passengers as common carriers throughout the United States, and particularly between the cities of Indianapolis, in the State of Indiana, and New York, in the State of *154Yew York, and were so engaged on and prior to the 31st day of March, 1874. That, on said 31 st day of March, 1874, this plaintiff engaged passage on one of the cars of the defendant, commonly known as a Pullman Palace or Sleeping Car, and selected his berth in said car, which berth was the lower…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Ry. Co. v. BirneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. FitzgeraldIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodruff Sleeping & Parlor Coach Co. v. DiehlIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. McKinney v. State ex rel. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Aplington v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API