United States v. Councilman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion En Banc
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
This case presents an important question of statutory construction. We must decide whether interception of an e-mail message in temporary, transient electronic storage states an offense under the Wiretap Act, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522. The government believes it does, and indicted Councilman under that theory. The district court disagreed and dismissed the indictment. A divided panel of this court affirmed. We granted review en banc and now reverse.1
I
A. An Introduction to Internet E-mail
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- National Organization for Marriage v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Patrick Hately v. Dr. David WattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.