Legal Opinion

United States v. Councilman

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 11, 2005No. 03-1383PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion En Banc

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This case presents an important question of statutory construction. We must decide whether interception of an e-mail message in temporary, transient electronic storage states an offense under the Wiretap Act, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522. The government believes it does, and indicted Councilman under that theory. The district court disagreed and dismissed the indictment. A divided panel of this court affirmed. We granted review en banc and now reverse.1

I

A. An Introduction to Internet E-mail

The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. National Organization for Marriage v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Patrick Hately v. Dr. David WattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API