Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
This action concerns the validity of an arbitration award issued by a three-person Board of Arbitration (the “Board”) convened for the purpose of arbitrating a collective bargaining dispute between the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (““WMATA”) and Local 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union (the “Union”). On February 17, 2011, the Court issued an Opinion and Order, Wash. Metro. Area Transit Awth. v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, — F.Supp.2d -, 2011 WL 691589 (D.Md.2011), that discussed in detail the manner in which the federal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patricia A. Mastro v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, NoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. GarveySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 2, Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, Afl-CioDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013