Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 2, Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, Afl-Cio
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court following the parties’ negotiation impasse and subsequent arbitration over the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. The petitioner is a local, public mass transit authority formed pursuant to an interstate compact; the respondent is a union of approximately 700 of the petitioner’s employees. After an extensive arbitration process spanning…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Unite Here Local 23 v. I.L. Creations of Maryland Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Acosta v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.