City of Atlanta v. Heirs of Champion
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentNichols, Chief Justice
I cannot subscribe to the majority’s holdings that "the Court of Appeals improperly acted as a fact finder, substituting its judgment for that of the special master and the trial judge,” and that "On appeal, the judgment must be affirmed unless shown to be clearly erroneous,” and, finally, that in regard to the actions of the special master and the trial court, "These findings should not be disturbed on appeal if there is any evidence to support them.”
*623No citation of authority is offered by the majority in support of the first two principles because, I submit, no authority exists for such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Piedmont Cotton Mills v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- HOUSING AUTHORITY &C. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Barrett v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- City of Atlanta v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977