Legal Opinion

Carl Eugene Valentine v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1959No. 17707PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was convicted and given a three-year sentence for a violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421. There were three persons engaged in the interstate expedition, the appellant and two women. The indictment charged the transportation of one of the women for the prohibited purpose. The defense was that the dominant purpose of the interstate movement was for accommodation and not for the immoral purpose. Such a defense is valid when proved. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 64 S.Ct. 1037, 88 L.Ed. 1331. Hawkins v. United States, 358 U.S. 74, 79 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Dowell, Inc. v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Arthur Eugene Byrd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. Edward Earl Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Manuel Ricardo Garcia and Niceforo Gutierrez-SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Cleo GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API