Legal Opinion

Arthur Eugene Byrd v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 14, 1965No. 18896_1PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

On this appeal from a robbery conviction, appellant urges trial court error in failing to instruct the jury that prior inconsistent statements of a defense witness could be considered only for impeachment purposes. The statements had been made by the witness during grand jury proceedings and introduced in this trial by the Government to impeach his inconsistent testimony given on direct examination. The Government urges that we adopt a rule, apparently followed in some jurisdictions, 1 which would permit the substantive use of prior inconsistent statements, if…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Hurley E. Underwood v. Richard Clark and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API