McCall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant, upon his pleas of guilty, was convicted of fraudulent use of a credit card and theft, and punishment was assessed at two and five years respectively-
A statement of the facts in these cases is not necessary, for, although appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in. several grounds of error in each cause, the record reflects a guilty plea, a written consent to stipulation of testimony, with stipulations, and appellant’s judicial confession in each cause. The judicial confessions alone are sufficient to support the respective convictions. See e. g.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Milliman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brandley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.