Legal Opinion
State v. Gardner
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1961PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
(Pro Tempore)
Defendant appeals from a conviction of the crime of burglary not in a dwelling.
The charging portion of the indictment is as follows:
“The said DONALD RAY GARDNER and ETT-GENE GARDNER on or about the 13th day of November, 1959, in the County of Lane and State of Oregon, then and there being, and then and there acting together and in pursuance of a common in*378tent with William Douglas Campbell and Bichard Alfred, did then and there willfully and unlawfully, and with intent to steal therein, break and enter a certain building of another which was not a dwelling, to-wit: the Tires…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. FlettOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. WederskiOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.