Legal Opinion

de Lima v. Mitchell

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to restrain the defendants from using their premises at Larchmont as a restaurant or saloon for the sale of intoxicating liquors.

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant, Harriet E. Mitchell, are respectively owners, of plots of land with buildings erected thereon, situated in the village of Larchmont. The plaintiff acquired title to his land in the spring of 1902, and thereafter erected a dwelling-house thereon' which he occupies with his family. The defendant Mitchell acquired title to her land in- October, 1887. At that time there were two small buildings on the property. Subsequently she erected two additional buildings, one of considerable size.

In the deeds to plaintiff and defendant, respectively, were restrictive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Levy v. Halcyon Casino Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Murray v. WestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Spencer v. MaverickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Gordon v. Incorporated Village of LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Cilberti v. AngillettaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Goodman v. KortschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API