Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1927No. 10399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Prosecution was under Art. 688, P. C. (1925) which declares any building where intoxicating liquor is kept, possessed, sold, etc., in violation of law, to be a common nuisance, and provides that whoever maintains such common nuisance shall be punished by confinement in the penitentiary not less than one nor more than five years. Conviction was had and punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

Omitting formal parts, the third count of the indictment (which was the only one submitted) alleged that appellant did maintain a common nuisance, in this, to-wit: “that he did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Luman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holliman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Dodd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Commander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API