Rood v. Merchants Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The case is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to a second amended complaint for insufficiency of facts. It appears from the complaint that the plaintiffs are the title holder, its vendee under a land contract, and a mortgagee of an apartment building. The defendants are four fire insurance companies that issued policies covering the building. The policies contained a mortgage clause in the usual form. A. fire occurred during the term of the policies and proofs of loss were duly filed. Not being able to agree on the amount of the loss the parties stipulated for arbitration and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hammond v. Capital City Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Lewis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Koepke v. SassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Heater v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Chicago Motor Club v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Chicago Motor Club v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Vidmar v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.