Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 28, 1996No. 92-2467-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Abraham Ramirez initiated this suit against IBP, inc., alleging that IBP wrongfully discharged him in violation of Kansas public policy, for pursuing rights under the Kansas Workers’ Compensation Act. After a five day trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The matter now comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion For A New Trial (Doc. # 183) filed July 26,1996.

Plaintiff asserts that the Court erred in excluding evidence that (1) defendant self-insures workers’ compensation claims; (2) defendant retains in-house counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gretchen Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Miller v. City of Mission, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  4. Marsh v. Coleman Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rivera v. RiveraDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API