Legal Opinion

People v. Winstanley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1970No. Docket 6,134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of false pretenses with intent to defraud * resulted in his conviction for that offense. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals from the denial of that motion.

A motion for new trial is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and to establish error in the denial of such a motion, clear abuse of discretion must be shown. People v. Dailey (1967), 6 Mich App 99.

A review of the record discloses evidence which, if believed by the jury, established each element of the crime with which defendant was charged. This evidence is sufficient to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. People v. OwensMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BoyntonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. JimmersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. HipshireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API